|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Anatcedent takes the place of a noun..... In grammar, an antecedent is generally the noun or noun phrase to which an anaphor refers in a coreference. However, an antecedent can also be a clause, especially when the anaphor is a demonstrative. In these sentences, the antecedent is in bold and the anaphor in italics:
In the above, the pronoun 'He' is referring to the noun 'Bob'. A common stylistic problem in writing, often leading to ambiguity, is the use of a pronoun for which the antecedent is not clear, as in the following example:
Did John tell the speaker about his own new friend? Did John tell the speaker about Mike's new friend? Did Mike tell the speaker about his own new friend? Or did Mike tell the speaker about John's new friend? Generally most competent speakers would agree that "he" refers to "John", this is normally explained in terms of salience, even still in ordinary speech, listeners are often confused by such sentences. Occasionally, the antecedent may be missing from the discourse, as when someone wonders out loud: "I wonder where I put it?", with no clear antecedent for the pronoun "it." Also the antecedent may not occur in the current discourse but instead refer to an object familiar to both speaker and listener, for example "the FBI." Antecedents are of particular importance in connection with relative pronouns; the pronoun usually opens the relative clause, but the antecedent is located in the main clause.
Sometimes the anaphor may not appear, but be implied by syntactic principles, this is called a zero anaphor.
(In this sentence, no anaphor appears explicitly, but an implicit zero anaphor, coreferent with the main clause subject, is the subject of the verb "fetch".) An antecedent may also be a clause as in this example
See alsoReferences
|
| All Right Reserved © 2007, Designed by Stylish Blog. |